Arizona senate dem hopeful kyrsten sinema promoted events featuring convicted terror lawyer creeping sharia best universities in texas

In the first event’s invite, sinema said the lawyer was “emphatically not guilty” and would not have been charged with the crime if it weren’t for “the hastily enacted PATRIOT act,” that expanded the U.S. Government’s power to surveil people and thus catch stewart passing on the messages in the wake of the september 11, 2001 terror attacks.

“last april, FBI agents arrested stewart at her brooklyn home. Top universities for law as they took her away in handcuffs, the FBI invaded and searched her manhattan office. Her crime? Doing her job for the past 27 years as an outspoken criminal defense lawyer,” it added.

Sinema’s description of stewart was not particularly accurate. Two years after the events in arizona, stewart was convicted of aiding the radical egyptian cleric to pass on secret messages to a U.S.-designated terror group, the islamic group.

She was initially sentenced to 28 months in prison but, in 2010, she was resentenced again for 10 years behind bars. The federal judge said stewart also committed perjury and lacked remorse after her first sentencing. The lawyer was eventually released in 2013 due to her medical condition and died in 2017.

As it happens, ms. Best universities for medicine stewart, who died in 2017, was my main adversary in the 1995 terrorism prosecution of her client, omar abdel rahman, better known as the “blind sheikh.” abdel rahman (who also died in 2017, just a few weeks before stewart) was the jihadist whom stewart was convicted of abetting; she helped him communicate with his murderous egyptian terrorist organization from the american prison where he was serving a life sentence.

At that time, stewart was under federal indictment for providing material support to terrorism. Essentially, she and two co-defendants, longtime abdel rahman aides ahmed abdel sattar and mohammed yousry, were accused of facilitating the blind sheikh’s communications with the islamic group ( gama’at al islamia), the egyptian terrorist organization the blind sheikh had helped found in the early 1980s (when it participated in the assassination of president anwar al-sadat).

By the time stewart and her co-defendants committed the crimes alleged in the indictment, the blind sheikh had been convicted (in the case I prosecuted) of (a) orchestrating a terrorist war against the united states that included the 1993 world trade center bombing and a subsequent (unsuccessful) plot to bomb new york city landmarks; (b) soliciting attacks on U.S. Military installations; and (c) conspiring to murder — and soliciting the murder of — egypt’s then-president, hosni mubarak. Sentenced to life imprisonment, the blind sheikh thereafter issued the fatwa (i.E., the islamic-law edict) that al-qaeda chief osama bin laden credited with authorizing the 9/11 attacks.

Stewart was emphatically guilty of materially supporting terrorism — so much so that, after she was convicted, a federal appeals court ordered that she be resentenced because the trial court had imposed an appallingly light 23-month term. Moreover, the crimes of which stewart was convicted — false statements, fraud against the united states, and material support to terrorism — had nothing to do with the PATRIOT act.

Contrary to the revisionist history she now attempts to peddle, kyrsten sinema was not a mere champion of due process. Top universities germany plain and simple, sinema was a public apologist for lynne stewart, who had brazenly abetted a notorious anti-american terrorist and his infamous jihadist organization. This stance was completely consistent with sinema’s unabashed radicalism at the time. There is no question that representative sinema had a first amendment right to express her views . . . Just as arizona voters in the ongoing senate campaign have every right and reason to weigh both her advocacy on stewart’s behalf and her disingenuous defense of it.

A reader alerted us that the open borders, communist-supporting democrat krysten sinema has been funded by her failed, muslim primary opponent – the terrorist bail-posting deedra aboud – and not only receives funds from the terror-linked hamas front group but held a fundraiser for CAIR.